Building King Salman Stadium · How much of the money stays in Saudi Arabia? · Group 8

MBSC EMBA · ECN 511 Economics for Managers

Building King Salman Stadium: how much of the money stays in Saudi Arabia?

Construction and Infrastructure · Topic B: the multiplier effect of public capital spending, and where the money leaks

Group 8Abdulmajeed AlajlanAbdulrahman AldahlawiSalman AlfarisMohammed AlghamdiAbdulaziz AlweheabNada AlyahyaHaifa Binnafisah

01 · Construction and Infrastructure

Our case: the 2034 World Cup stadium programme

King Salman Stadium concept rendering 92,760 planned seats · King Salman Stadium, Riyadh
King Salman Stadium concept rendering © Populous

A stadium buys civil works, materials, building systems and specialist expertise.

  • Ministry of Sport buys the works.
  • Populous designs the stadium.
  • Contractors and specialist suppliers deliver.
15stadiums in 5 host cities
7.8%of Saudi value added, 2023 sector scale
SAR 646bngross output, 2023

Sources: FIFA 2034 bid evaluation; GASTAT Supply and Use Tables 2023; Ministry of Sport; Populous [R01, R05, R02–R03, R53].

Part 1 · The sector

A World Cup stadium is a construction job inside a sector worth 7.8% of the Saudi economy

7.8%of Saudi value added comes from construction (SAR 338bn of SAR 4,333bn, 2023)
SAR 646bnconstruction output in 2023, of which SAR 307.5bn is bought-in inputs
15stadiums across 5 host cities in FIFA’s 2024 bid evaluation
92,760planned seats at King Salman Stadium, Riyadh — our case
StadiumSeatsWho buysWho suppliesPublished value
Prince Mohammed bin Salman Stadium, Qiddiya45,000Qiddiya Investment Co.FCC (Spain) – Nesma (KSA); Elegancia: mechanical SAR 829m; IKK Fangda: facade SAR 997m ex-VATabout SAR 4.0bn
Aramco Stadium, Al Khobar46,096Saudi AramcoBesix (Belgium) – Albawani (KSA)about SAR 3.7bn
King Salman Stadium, Riyadh — our case92,760Ministry of SportMain works prequalification notice (Nov 2025); design by PopulousNot published

International–Saudi joint ventures deliver the main works; specialist imported systems arrive through subcontracts.

Sources: R05 (sheet 6.3), R01, R02–R03, R57, R58, R23–R24. Calculation: construction gross value added 338.3bn ÷ total GVA 4,332.9bn = 7.81% (GASTAT 2023, sheet 6.3).

02 · The spending multiplier, in simple terms

One public payment creates income that people spend again

GDP multiplier = extra GDP caused ÷ extra public spending

Illustration: SAR 100m extra spending causes SAR 120m extra GDP. Multiplier = 1.2.

Micro

A firm chooses a supplier.

Macro

The combined effect on GDP.

Our topic

The spending multiplier is macroeconomics.

Source: IMF, Fiscal Multipliers, 2014, section II [R69]. Teaching example, not a Saudi estimate.

03 · Construction and Saudi GDP

Our sector creates assets and adds value through Saudi production

GASTAT 2023 [R05]Saudi construction, 2023 — SAR billion
7.8%of Saudi gross value added

GDP counts the extra value created at each Saudi stage once. A local supplier’s full invoice also includes inputs bought from other firms.

Academy link: qualified local suppliers can win orders and create extra Saudi value.

Source: GASTAT, Supply and Use Tables 2023, sheets 6.2–6.3 [R05]. Sector share describes scale, not a GDP multiplier.

Part 1 · How import-dependent it is

Construction’s two most imported inputs: basic metals (54.5%) and electrical machinery (50.3%)

Metals and electrical machinery are half imported; by amount, chemical products and metals are the largest leaks.

Source: GASTAT, Supply and Use Tables 2023 [R05] — use: sheet 6.2 col. H; import rate: sheet 6.1 Total imports (AA) ÷ Supply at basic prices (AB). National ratios applied to construction purchases; GASTAT does not publish this split directly.

04 · Applying the multiplier to our case

Applying a SAR 4.5bn stadium scenario

about SAR 4.0bnQiddiya stadium · 45,000 seats
about SAR 3.7bnAramco Stadium · 46,096 seats
SAR 4.5bnGroup scenario, not a published budget or a validated cost estimate
Round 1Estimated purchases using GASTAT 2023 construction ratios

Sources: R57, R58 (benchmarks); GASTAT Supply and Use Tables 2023, sheets 6.1–6.2 [R05]. Group scenario using national ratios; figures are rounded.

05 · The materials behind the import leakage

Estimated imports in the SAR 4.5bn stadium scenario

Stadium importsSAR 421m19.7% of the SAR 2,143m estimated purchases, split by input
SAR 177mChemicals + metals · 42% of stadium’s imports
Actual item check

Grade, quantity, origin, certification and price from supplier schedules.

Examples under each group are illustrative. Each bar retains its whole GASTAT group value. Source: GASTAT, Supply and Use Tables 2023, sheets 6.1–6.2 [R05]. National product ratios applied to construction use; group scenario, not invoices.

06 · Stadium EPP at 20 percent, credit up to 6

Assessment basis: the official April 2026 consultation framework

SAR 421mEstimated stadium imports · SAR 4.5bn scenario, slide 5
×
20%Second import tier · SAR 300m–500m per tender
=
SAR 84mRequired EP credit · 421m × 20%

Assumption: one main contract with one company, so all SAR 421m counts.

Draft category factors

Knowledge transfer / localisation 1–3
Technology transfer / exports 2–4

4 + 2 = 6

Qualifying base + approved bonus. Rare technology or other eligible grounds.

Credit differs from cash, GDP and ROI.

Source: LCGPA, Economic Participation Policy Update, consultation text, Articles 6–9 [R63]; DGA Group, April 2026. Imports: group scenario [R05]. Actual tender terms control the applicable version.

07 · London 2012 offers a construction skills lesson

A fixed event deadline made live-site learning especially valuable

3,000+training places
408apprentices
✓ What worked

Training connected to real construction jobs.

▲ What was weaker

Encouragement without binding targets made skills objectives harder.

Saudi adaptation: paid practice, independent tests and a return-to-train commitment

Sources: UK DCMS, 2012 Games construction on track, 20 May 2012 [R12]; Crossrail Learning Legacy, 2018 [R13]. Counts do not prove retained jobs.

08 · The controls that make the solution credible

Five risks, five controls

Routine training earns extra creditRecord existing duties. Fund new competence, rights or tooling.
IP cannot be used independentlyAgree licences, diagnostic access, trainer rights and export territory.
Shared delivery duplicates claimsKeep each supplier’s approved activities, cost allocation and ledger separate.
Local substitutes or bulk buying failTest grades, capacity and full cost. Use fair lots and multiple suppliers.
Skills have no work after handoverConfirm placements before training and contract the next site.

Evidence at three points

Beforebaseline and rights
Completionindependent tests
6 / 12 monthswork and trainer return

Sources: LCGPA consultation Arts. 8(3), 13–16 [R63]; WIPO licensing [R64]; OECD competition safeguards [R68]; UK additionality study [R54].

09 · One academy with three connected functions

Shared delivery across eligible stadium suppliers, with separate EP obligations

Shared EPP proposal: eligible stadium vendors jointly fund ONE academy. Each vendor contributes approved funding, trainers, equipment or licensed know-how.

01

License and train

Licensed manuals and software
HVAC rigs and coating-test kits
Paid practice and Saudi trainers

Evidence: NITI training; WIPO licensing terms

02

Qualify Saudi materials

Coatings, sealants and metals
Test specific grades and origin
Material passports for approvals

Evidence: ALUPCO extrusion; Sika Saudi admixture production

03

Buy together

Common performance specifications
Competitive framework and call-offs
Verify discounts and full cost

Evidence: OECD purchasing efficiency and competition

One qualified host runs the programme. Sharing trainers, equipment and demand reduces duplicated training and keeps skills available across sites.

LCGPA approves vendor roles and cost allocations. Each vendor keeps its own EP obligation and ledger. Each activity earns credit once.

Later: export Saudi-owned courses, licensed services and qualified products.

Sources: NITI [R42]; official LCGPA draft Arts. 8–9 [R63]; WIPO [R64]; OECD [R65, R68]; ALUPCO [R66]; Sika [R67]. Candidate capabilities, not partner commitments.

10 · Hands-on training first, academy after evidence

Begin inside real projects with an existing qualified training provider

Joint agreement first: vendor commitments, LCGPA-approved activities and separate credit records.

1

Confirm demand

Employers identify the skills gap and sign paid site placements. Vendor roles and funding are agreed.

Condition to proceedNext-site work, budget, IP rights, tools and approvals are confirmed. Signed licences and EP cost allocations.

2

Run the pilot

Supplier mentors teach on real equipment. Independent tests and trainer practice. Saudi trainers teach the next cohort.

Condition to proceedVerify practical competence, paid deployment and unit cost. Record extra capability beyond routine duties.

3

Expand if proven

Repeat cohorts build an academy. A permanent facility needs its own case. Use existing facilities where adequate.

Condition to proceedContinuing jobs and orders, proven results and acceptable quality and cost. Track work and trainer return at 6/12 months.

No confirmed paid demand: defer intake. Weak results: redesign or stop.

Suggested start: 24 learners, 6 trainer candidates, 2 eligible sites. Targets for agreement.

Basis: report Sections 5–8 and Appendix F. Sources: NITI [R42], training evaluation [R54], LCGPA draft [R63], WIPO [R64]. Proposed design.

11 · Value now and after the stadium opens

What stays after the cranes leave

ValueDuring constructionAfter handover
Skills and academic capabilityPaid practice, independent tests, manuals and trainer developmentNext-site work, returning trainers and further recognised qualifications
Local products and IPApproved local grades, tooling and usable technical rightsRepeat orders, deeper production and independent Saudi services
Buyer valueJoint offers, less duplicated buying and comparable full-cost pricesReusable specifications and resilient multi-supplier sourcing
Export valueSaudi-authored content and rights prepared for later marketsPaid courses, licensed services and qualified products sold abroad

Illustrative materials opportunity

25% of the SAR 177m basket ≈ SAR 44m more domestic purchases

Source: GASTAT-based group scenario [R05]. Benefits are proposals. No discount or export revenue is assumed. Domestic purchases, savings and credit are separate.

12 · The decision for LCGPA and the buyer

A shared Materials and Systems Academy pilot

Proposed joint programme for all participating eligible stadium vendors · one academy, agreed vendor contributions and individual compliance records.

LCGPA

Approve extra activities, rights, factors and separate supplier ledgers.

Authorised buyer

Approve competitive joint procurement and construction gates.

Delivery partners

Agree paid placements, material trials, trainer return and follow-up.

EP credit planSAR 84m from about SAR 36m of activity (average factor 2.33; SAR 63m at low-end factors)

Why these factors: LCGPA sets the final factor within each draft range. We start at the minimum and add 1 per condition met: usable licences (2→3), new skills with independent tests (1→2), approved Saudi materials with real orders (1→2). Not the maximum: no manufacturing rights, recognised qualification or new plant.

Proposed start: 24 learners, 6 trainer candidates, 2 confirmed eligible sites

Proposal targets for agreement, not forecasts or observed results. Scale on proven skills, demand, quality, cost and licensed rights. Policy basis: LCGPA [R63].

Group 8 · MBSC EMBA · ECN 511

Thank you

Questions welcome

King Salman Stadium · Riyadh 2034

Sources 1 of 4

Case, sector and stadium packages

  1. R01FIFA World Cup 2034 Bid Evaluation Report, 2024, pp 46–51FIFA, 29 November 2024. source
  2. R17FIFA host appointment, 11 December 2024Extraordinary FIFA Congress appoints hosts of 2030 and 2034 editions. source
  3. R05GASTAT Supply and Use Tables 2023, sheets 6.1–6.2Supply and Use and Input-Output Tables by Sections 2023, released 2025; thousand SAR. source
  4. R02MoS King Salman main works notice, 25 November 2025Prequalification invitation; deadline 16 February 2026. source
  5. R03MoS King Salman preliminary works notice, 7 April 2026Prequalification invitation; deadline 28 April 2026. source
  6. R53Populous King Salman Stadium project and concept imagesUndated project page. Designer identity. source
  7. R23Estithmar mechanical package announcement, 10 September 2026Elegancia Arabia Trading awarded SAR 829m mechanical works, Prince Mohammed bin Salman Stadium. source
  8. R24China Fangda facade package filing, 19 October 2026Announcement 2026-41; SAR 1,146.9m incl. VAT / SAR 997.3m excl. VAT. source

Evidence basis: report updated 21 October 2026. Course material: [C1] George, R. E., Assessment Guidelines for ECN 511, MBSC, 30 September 2026; [C2] MBSC, ECN 511 Course Syllabus Modular A1, 2026; [C3] George, R. E., EPP assessment update allowing supporting localisation evidence, email received 20 October 2026. No public URLs. References and backup material sit outside the eight-minute presentation.

Sources 2 of 4

Policy, benchmark and training evidence

  1. R09LCGPA Economic Participation Policy, Unit 7, historical training materialPC-GEN-TM-ECP-EN-V12, pp. 4–5, 11–15, 21–22. source
  2. R11Umm Al-Qura EPP consultation notice, 14 April 2026Consultation notice; not an adoption notice. source
  3. R27DGA analysis of the EPP consultation draft, April 2026DGA Group / Albright Stonebridge Group, pp. 4–6. source
  4. R12UK government London 2012 construction release, 20 May 20122012 Games construction on track thanks to 12,000-strong workforce. source
  5. R13Crossrail Learning Legacy, contractual skills targets, 2018Eldred and Blin, 17 August 2018, section 1.2. source
  6. R14EXPRO Operations Management Introduction Guideline, 2021EOM-ZO0-GL-000001, Rev. 001, sections 6.3–6.7. source
  7. R42NITI Apprenticeship Program, undated brochureCandidate training capability only. source
  8. R54UK BIS Measuring Additionality in Apprenticeships, 2013Research Paper 138, pp. 9–13. source
  9. R55Local content preference regulation, Resolution 245, 2019Articles 4, 11–16 and 18–22. source
  10. R56LCGPA mechanisms for government entities, Unit 2PC-GOV-TM-MCI-EN-V12. source
  11. R08IMF Saudi Arabia Article IV, 2024, Box 1Country Report 24/280, printed p. 10. source

AI use: ChatGPT supported research, calculations, charts and drafting. Claude supported review. No original interviews or field data are claimed. Facts, teaching assumptions and proposals remain labelled. The submitting group remains responsible for source checks and final approval.

Sources 3 of 4

Updated stadium comparisons

  1. R57Argaam, Qiddiya stadium contract, October 2024Qiddiya awards SAR 4B stadium project contract to Saudi-Spanish consortium. source
  2. R58MEED, Saudi Arabia selects Dammam stadium contractor, 26 February 2024Besix–Albawani, est. SAR 3.7bn. source
  3. R59StadiumDB, Aramco Stadium design and capacity, undatedsource
  4. R60StadiumDB, Qiddiya stadium design and capacity, undatedsource
  5. R69IMF, Fiscal Multipliers, 2014, section IIBatini, Eyraud, Forni and Weber, Technical Notes and Manuals 14/04. Definition and teaching example on slide 2. source

Verification: GASTAT Supply and Use Tables 2023 downloaded 27 October 2026. The supplied ratios reproduce 60.507bn of modelled imported construction inputs by applying each national product import ratio to construction use — an estimate, not an observed industry import-use matrix. BESIX’s official project page confirms the Aramco client and BESIX–ALBAWANI JV (source). Official capacities are approximately 47,000; the retained 46,096 is the FIFA bid design scope. Current public procurement notices do not establish an awarded King Salman main package.

Sources 4 of 4

Policy and solution evidence

  1. R63LCGPA, Economic Participation Policy Update, April 2026 consultation, Arts. 3–19Official Arabic consultation text, read 28 October 2026. Consultation text, not an adoption notice. source
  2. R64WIPO, Technology Transfer Agreements, licensing rights and scopeLicensing, territory, field of use and ownership. source
  3. R65OECD, Government at a Glance 2025, section 11.5, centralised purchasingsource
  4. R66ALUPCO, Aluminium, Saudi extrusion, die-making and finishing capabilityCapability evidence, not a commitment to this proposal. source
  5. R67Sika, New Saudi admixture factory, 27 June 2018, official releaseHistoric capability evidence, not proof of every coating grade or current capacity. source
  6. R68OECD, SMEs in Public Procurement, 2018, Box 2.4, competition safeguardssource

The primary draft was read directly from the official Istitlaa consultation HTML on 28 October 2026. It is a consultation text, not an adoption notice. The supporting sources establish mechanisms and existing capabilities, not committed project partners or guaranteed performance.

Next
Click, or press →, to drive in